What are State Parties required to do with individuals who commit acts of torture?

State Parties are required to prosecute individuals who commit acts of torture under domestic law as outlined in international treaties, such as the United Nations Convention Against Torture. This obligation stems from the principle that torture is a serious violation of human rights and must be addressed through legal mechanisms. The duty to prosecute serves to ensure accountability and support victims in their quest for justice.

By enforcing such laws, the state demonstrates a commitment to uphold the rule of law and deter future acts of torture. This obligation reflects the understanding that impunity for torture undermines the very basis of a humane and just society. Legal frameworks in many countries explicitly incorporate this mandate, reinforcing the importance of holding offenders accountable.

The other options, while they may have their own merits in different contexts, do not fulfill the specific obligations laid out in international law regarding the prosecution of torture. Granting amnesty, for instance, can undermine the accountability that is necessary for a just resolution to such crimes. Sending individuals to rehabilitation programs or providing them with legal counsel does not address the necessity of legal accountability for torture and can detract from holding perpetrators responsible for their actions.