How is the reasonableness of an applicant's explanation evaluated?

The reasonableness of an applicant's explanation is evaluated by assessing detail, internal consistency, and plausibility. This method focuses on the coherence and logic within the applicant’s own narrative and the details provided. A detailed account allows the assessing officer to determine whether the explanation aligns well with the applicant's experiences and the surrounding circumstances.

Internal consistency is crucial as it ensures that various parts of the applicant’s story do not contradict each other, which would raise doubts about its authenticity. The plausibility aspect looks at how believable the explanation is in the context of the applicant's background and the general situation in their country of origin. By examining these elements, an officer can arrive at a more informed decision about the credibility of the statement given by the applicant.

Using just external validation, comparing testimonies, or focusing solely on eligibility may not fully capture the complexities of the applicant's situation and could lead to misunderstandings regarding their individual circumstances. Thus, the holistic approach involving detailed assessment ensures a fair evaluation of the applicant's claims.